The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-8125•Jose Antonio Morales v. Captain John Charles Holly; Sgt. Charles Brian Estes
12-8125Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 24, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-8125
JOSE ANTONIO MORALES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN JOHN CHARLES HOLLY; SGT. CHARLES BRIAN ESTES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00175-CCE-LPA)
Submitted: April 4, 2013 Decided: April 24, 2013
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose Antonio Morales, Appellant Pro Se. James R. Morgan, Jr.,
WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jose Antonio Morales appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Morales v. Holly, No. 1:09-cv-00175-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C.
Oct. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.