The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-8122•Tanyin B. Holley v. D. SHIRLEY, Correctional Officer
12-8122Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 16, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-8122
TANYIN B. HOLLEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
D. SHIRLEY, Correctional Officer,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
DIXON, Correctional Officer; E.P. WARD, Sergeant,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:11-cv-00508-GBL-JFA)
Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: May 16, 2013
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tanyin B. Holley, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville,
NORRIS & ST. CLAIR, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tanyin B. Holley, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment to Defendant D. Shirley in
Holley’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) proceeding. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Holley v.
Shirley, No. 1:11-cv-00508-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 19 &
entered Nov. 20, 2012). We deny Holley’s motion for appointment
of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.