The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-8109•Damon Emanuel Elliott v. United States of America
12-8109Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-8109
DAMON EMANUEL ELLIOTT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:12-cv-03350-PJM)
Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 26, 2013
Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Damon Emanuel Elliott, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Damon Emanuel Elliott appeals the district court’s
order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1361 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant Elliott leave to
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Elliott v. United States, No.
8:12-cv-03350-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.