The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-8108•United States of America v. Albert Randolph, a/k/a Spo
12-8108Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 22, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-8108
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ALBERT RANDOLPH, a/k/a Spo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:01-cr-00304-JRS-11)
Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffy,
Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Albert Randolph appeals from the district court’s
order denying his motion for sentencing transcripts. The
district court’s order was entered on November 26, 2012.
However, on January 22, 2013, the district court granted
Randolph’s subsequent motion for sentencing transcripts. As
Randolph has already received the relief he seeks, we dismiss
the appeal as moot. We deny Randolph’s motion to vacate his
conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.