Morris J. Pettigrew, Sr. v. Corizon Medical Services

12-8077Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 25, 2013

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-8077
MORRIS J. PETTIGREW, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES; PAUL MATERA, MD; DAVID M. MATHIS,
MD; LINO QUILO, MD; JOSEPH INZERILLO, MD; BRUCE FORD, PA;
JESSICA CECIL, PA; JENNIFER PATTERSON, RN; DR. CLEM, Medical
Director,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Party Below.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George Levi Russell, III, District
Judge. (1:12-cv-01713-GLR)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 25, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Morris J. Pettigrew, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Davis,
III, Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN &

-- 1 of 3 --

2
COURTNEY, PC, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Morris J. Pettigrew, Sr., seeks to appeal the district
court’s order assessing a filing fee and denying his motion to
appoint counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-
46 (1949). The order Pettigrew seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.