The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-8053•Richard Earl Wilson, Jr. v. Thomas
12-8053Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 22, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-8053
RICHARD EARL WILSON, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:12-cv-00540-RBS-TEM)
Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Earl Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard Earl Wilson, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Wilson v. Thomas, No.
2:12-cv-00540-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.