The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7997•Albert Charles Eichel v. MACDONALD, Ms.; Chapline; BENNETT, Ms.; Major
12-7997Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 23, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7997
ALBERT CHARLES EICHEL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MACDONALD, Ms.; Chapline; BENNETT, Ms.; Major,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-01220-TSE-TRJ)
Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 23, 2013
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert Charles Eichel, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Albert Charles Eichel appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). On appeal, we confine our review to
the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Because Eichel’s informal brief does not challenge the
basis for the district court’s disposition, Eichel has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we deny
Eichel’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm the district
court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.