The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7948•Darryl L. Cook v. United States of America
12-7948Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7948
DARRYL L. COOK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Richard M. Gergel, District
Judge. (0:11-cv-02669-RMG)
Submitted: March 20, 2013 Decided: April 26, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl L. Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darryl L. Cook appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment to the Defendant in this action
brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cook v.
United States, No. 0:11-cv-02669-RMG (D.S.C. Nov. 2, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.