The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7726•Douglas B. Seibert v. NANNIE MOHEAD, S2 VCE Woodshop Manager
12-7726Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 27, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7726
DOUGLAS B. SEIBERT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NANNIE MOHEAD, S2 VCE Woodshop Manager; FRANK ROACH, Unit
Manager/Building Supervisor; JESSE ARRINGTON, Correctional
Officer; MILTON REED, VCE General Manager; DOUG CHAPMAN, S2
VCE Woodshop Manager; BELTON WILLIAMS, VCE Industrial Group
Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (2:12-cv-00399-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 27, 2012
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas B. Seibert, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas B. Seibert appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Seibert’s motion to
appoint counsel, and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Seibert v. Mohead, No. 2:12-cv-00399-RAJ-TEM
(E.D. Va. Sept. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.