The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7674•United States of America v. Curtis Allen Young
12-7674Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 28, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7674
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CURTIS ALLEN YOUNG,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District
Judge. (2:01-cr-00227-AWA-1)
Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: February 28, 2013
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Allen Young, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Allen Young appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion seeking a reduction of his sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We court review the denial of a
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for abuse of discretion. United States v.
Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir. 2010). We have reviewed the
record and conclude that, as the district court held, Young is
ineligible for the reduction he seeks. Id. at 187. To the
extent Young also seeks a reduction of his sentence under
Amendments 599 and 750 of the Sentencing Guidelines, neither
amendment is assists him.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.