The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7639•Dickinson Norman Adionser v. United States of America; United States Drug Enforcement Administration Agency
12-7639Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 27, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7639
DICKINSON NORMAN ADIONSER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT
ADMINISTRATION AGENCY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:12-
cv-00700-RWT)
Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dickinson Norman Adionser, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dickinson Norman Adionser appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his civil complaint filed pursuant to
the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (2006), the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2006), and the Federal
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (2006), and denying
his subsequent motion to alter or amend. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.
Adionser v. United States, No. 8:12-cv-00700-RWT (D. Md. Mar.
20, 2012, July 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.