The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7621•Floyd Granger, a/k/a Floyd Randolph Granger, III v. Director Scotty Bodiford
12-7621Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 28, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7621
FLOYD GRANGER, a/k/a Floyd Randolph Granger, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR SCOTTY BODIFORD; GREENVILLE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT
CENTER AND HEALTH SERVICES; UNKNOWN MEDICAL PERSONNEL;
GREENVILLE COUNTY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District
Judge. (6:11-cv-01162-RBH)
Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: February 28, 2013
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Floyd Granger, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher R. Antley, DEVLIN
& PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Floyd Granger appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Granger v. Dir. Bodiford, No. 6:11-cv-01162-RBH (D.S.C.
Sept. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.