The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7588•United States of America v. James Thomas Wallace
12-7588Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 27, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7588
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES THOMAS WALLACE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:03-cr-00918-TLW-1)
Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 27, 2012
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Thomas Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Thomas Wallace appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to modify sentence under 18 U.S.C. §
3582(c)(1)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wallace’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm the order of the district
court. United States v. Wallace, No. 4:03-cr-00918-TLW-1
(D.S.C. July 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.