United States of America v. Ronnie Earl Knox

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7523
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RONNIE EARL KNOX,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:03-cr-00220-FDW-4)
Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Earl Knox, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ronnie Earl Knox appeals the district court’s orders
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his
sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm. United States v. Knox, No. 3:03-cr-00220-FDW-4
(W.D.N.C. July 16, 2012, Aug. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --