The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7508•Dennis Michael Gallipeau v. Linda Mickens-Ham
12-7508Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 27, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7508
DENNIS MICHAEL GALLIPEAU,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LINDA MICKENS-HAM,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JANE DOE; LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; OFFICER MACK,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(3:09-cv-01883-TMC)
Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 27, 2012
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Michael Gallipeau, Appellant Pro Se. Evan Markus
Gessner, Michael Stephen Pauley, LIDE & PAULEY, LLC, Lexington,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Gallipeau appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without
prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Gallipeau v. Mickens-Ham, No. 3:09-cv-01883-TMC (D.S.C.
Aug. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.