The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7477•Carl Edward Wiley v. GREGORY A. NEWMAN, Individually
12-7477Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 27, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7477
CARL EDWARD WILEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GREGORY A. NEWMAN, Individually and in their Official
Capacity; NATHAN C. RAMSEY, Individually and in their
Official Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:11-cv-00256-RJC)
Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 27, 2012
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl Edward Wiley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carl Edward Wiley appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wiley’s motion to
schedule oral argument and affirm the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. Wiley v. Newman, No. 1:11-cv-
00256-RJC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.