The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7448•United States of America v. Victor Anderson, a/k/a Vito
12-7448Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 16, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7448
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VICTOR ANDERSON, a/k/a Vito,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (2:05-cr-00007-JPB-DJJ-1)
Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: November 16, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Victor Anderson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) (2006), in which Anderson sought a reduction of his
sentence, imposed in 2006, to the low end of the applicable
Guidelines range. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Anderson, No. 2:05-cr-
00007-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 20, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.