The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7433•United States of America v. Clarence Edward Cyrus, a/k/a CC, a/k/a Red
12-7433Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 6, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7433
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLARENCE EDWARD CYRUS, a/k/a CC, a/k/a Red,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (4:99-cr-00221-CMC-1)
Submitted: October 22, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Edward Cyrus, Appellant Pro Se. William E. Day, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina;
Mark C. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Edward Cyrus appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Cyrus, No. 4:99-cr-00221-CMC-1 (D.S.C. filed June 29,
2012, and filed July 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.