United States of America v. Thaddeus Jones, a/k/a Mann

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7377
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
THADDEUS JONES, a/k/a Mann,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:10-cr-00090-RAJ-TEM-1)
Submitted: January 2, 2013 Decided: January 25, 2013
Before KING, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thaddeus Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Thaddeus Jones appeals the district court’s orders
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
in his sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual (2010), and its order denying his motion for
reconsideration. We conclude that the district court properly
determined that Jones was ineligible for a sentence reduction
because his sentencing range was determined by his career
offender designation, not the drug quantities attributable to
him, and thus was not impacted by Amendment 750. United
States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010). We also
conclude that the district court correctly denied Jones’ motion
for reconsideration. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s orders. United States v. Jones, No. 2:10-cr-00090-RAJ-
TEM-1 (E.D. Va. June 13, 2012 & Aug. 1, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --