The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7354•United States of America v. Tony Hoey, a/k/a Sld Dft 13
12-7354Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 26, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7354
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TONY HOEY, a/k/a Sld Dft 13,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (4:96-cr-00053-MR-13)
Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tony Hoey, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Amy Elizabeth
Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill Westmoreland Rose,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina;
Adam Christopher Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tony Hoey appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Hoey, No. 4:96-cr-
00053-MR-13 (W.D.N.C. June 6, 2012; Aug. 3, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.