The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7314•United States of America v. Dwight Lamont Ashe
12-7314Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 9, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7314
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DWIGHT LAMONT ASHE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:04-cr-00088-HEH-1)
Submitted: June 27, 2013 Decided: July 9, 2013
Before KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwight Lamont Ashe, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dwight Lamont Ashe appeals the district court’s order
granting in part and denying in part his motion to correct a
clerical error in sentencing reflected in the July 2, 2012 order
granting a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Ashe, No. 3:04-cr-00088-HEH-1
(E.D. Va. July 26, 2012). We deny Ashe’s motion to expedite as
moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.