The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7296•Arthur R. Carter v. WARDEN, FCI Edgefield
12-7296Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7296
ARTHUR R. CARTER,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, FCI Edgefield,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-01257-TMC)
Submitted: December 11, 2012 Decided: December 20, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur R. Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur R. Carter, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Carter v. Warden, No. 1:12-cv-
01257-TMC (D.S.C. July 25, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.