The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7288•Billy G. Asemani v. FRANK B. BISHOP, Warden, WCI
12-7288Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 30, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7288
BILLY G. ASEMANI,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
FRANK B. BISHOP, Warden, WCI,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-02075-RDB)
Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 30, 2012
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court’s order
construing his self-styled application for habeas relief as a
petition for writ of mandamus and dismissing it without
prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Asemani v. Bishop, No.
1:12-cv-02075-RDB (D. Md. July 19, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.