United States of America v. Dirk Ladson, a/k/a Dezo, a/k/a Eugene Martin

12-7249Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 6, 2012

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7249
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DIRK LADSON, a/k/a Dezo, a/k/a Eugene Martin,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-10)
Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dirk Ladson, Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Elaine O’Boyle,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Dirk Ladson appeals the district court’s order denying
his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction
based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Our review
of the record demonstrates that Amendment 750 did not alter
Ladson’s Guidelines range. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. United States v. Ladson, No. 2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-
10 (E.D. Va. filed July 12, 2012; entered July 13, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.