The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7247•Marcus Griffin v. ANGIE GRAVES, IGC official capacity
12-7247Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 16, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7247
MARCUS GRIFFIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANGIE GRAVES, IGC official capacity; ANNIE MAE SELLERS,
official capacity; LIEUTENANT JAMES MARTIN, official
capacity; MS. PAMELA MCDOWELL, official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (4:12-cv-01163-CMC)
Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 16, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcus Griffin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 3 --
PER CURIAM:
Marcus Griffin seeks to appeal the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
summarily dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. The
district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant
to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp. 2012). The
magistrate judge recommended summarily dismissing Griffin’s
action and advised Griffin that failure to file timely
objections to the recommendation could waive appellate review of
a district court order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation. United States v.
Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir. 2007); Wright v.
Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). Because Griffin
received notice of the consequences of a failure to object to
the magistrate judge’s report and yet failed to do so, he has
waived appellate review.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district
court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
-- 2 of 3 --
3
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.