The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7187•United States of America v. Myron Douglas Thomas, a/k/a Dog, a/k/a Mad Dog, a/k/a MD
12-7187Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 11, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7187
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MYRON DOUGLAS THOMAS, a/k/a Dog, a/k/a Mad Dog, a/k/a MD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (7:06-cr-00083-FL-3)
Submitted: May 13, 2013 Decided: June 11, 2013
Before KING and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon,
Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellant. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Myron Douglas Thomas appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for
sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Thomas, No.
7:06-cr-00083-FL-3 (E.D.N.C. July 5, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.