Ricky Bartlett v. Max Robeson; Anthony Forbes; Jon Worthington

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7156
RICKY BARTLETT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MAX ROBESON; ANTHONY FORBES; JON WORTHINGTON,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CAMDEN SHERIFF’S DEPT.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03008-BO)
Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Bartlett, Appellant Pro Se. Sonny Sade Haynes, WOMBLE
CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Bartlett appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and his
numerous motions for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Bartlett v.
Robeson, No. 5:11-ct-03008-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21 & June 15,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --