The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7128•United States of America v. Daryl W. Smith, a/k/a D-Nice
12-7128Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 14, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7128
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DARYL W. SMITH, a/k/a D-Nice,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00039-FPS-9)
Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 14, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daryl W. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, Assistant
United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Daryl W. Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 to correct an
alleged clerical error in his amended judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Smith, No. 1:03-cr-00039-FPS-9 (N.D.W. Va. June 22,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.