The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7110•Douglas G. Whitfield v. Officer Lee; Officer Stancil; Lieutenant Smith
12-7110Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 26, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7110
DOUGLAS G. WHITFIELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER LEE; OFFICER STANCIL; LIEUTENANT SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DICK JENKINS, Sheriff; RANDLE SMITH, Lieutenant; DARREL
LAND, Detective,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:10-ct-03151-D)
Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas G. Whitfield, Appellant Pro Se. Sonny Sade Haynes,
WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas G. Whitfield appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment to the defendants on his claims
filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Whitfield v. Lee, No.
5:10-ct-03151-D (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.