The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7057•James Anthony May v. Dr. Nina Ward; Nurse G. Mullen
12-7057Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 6, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7057
JAMES ANTHONY MAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. NINA WARD; NURSE G. MULLEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 12-7071
JAMES ANTHONY MAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCOTT BRAIN; JAMES R. CHELLIS; JANE DOE; DR. PHILLIP
PERKINS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03065-FL; 5:11-ct-03088-FL)
Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Anthony May, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
James Anthony May appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaints. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. May v. Ward, No. 5:11-ct-03065-FL (E.D.N.C.
June 8, 2012); May v. Brain, No. 5:11-ct-03088-FL (E.D.N.C. June
8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.