The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7053•United States of America v. Bobby Michael Jordan
12-7053Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 15, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7053
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BOBBY MICHAEL JORDAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:04-cr-00357-NCT-1)
Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 15, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobby Michael Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael
Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bobby Michael Jordan appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no abuse of discretion by the district court. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Jordan, No. 1:04-cr-00357-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. May 25,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.