The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-7003•United States of America v. Llewellen Fernando Smith, a/k/a Louie
12-7003Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 7, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7003
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LLEWELLEN FERNANDO SMITH, a/k/a Louie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:96-cr-00066-REP-20)
Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Llewellen Fernando Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Stephen
Wiley Miller, Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Brian R. Hood, David John Novak, Brian L. Whisler, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; Andrew Gerald
McBride, WILEY REIN, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Llewellen Fernando Smith appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:96-cr-00066-REP-20 (E.D.
Va. May 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.