The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6923•United States of America v. Enoc Alcantara-Mendez
12-6923Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 22, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6923
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner – Appellee,
v.
ENOC ALCANTARA-MENDEZ,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:11-hc-02178-BR)
Submitted: September 28, 2012 Decided: October 22, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Enoc Alcantara-Mendez, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Huband,
BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Enoc Alcantara-Mendez appeals the district court’s
orders committing him to the custody of the Attorney General
under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2006) and denying his motions for
reconsideration. Our review of the record leads us to conclude
that the district court did not err in finding that
Alcantara-Mendez met the criteria for commitment and did not err
in denying his motions for reconsideration. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.