The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6913•Rex Hatfield; Everly Hatfield v. Robert L. Garrison; Ralph Moore; Davy Pierson
12-6913Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 2, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6913
REX HATFIELD; EVERLY HATFIELD,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
ROBERT L. GARRISON; RALPH MOORE; DAVY PIERSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger,
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00498)
Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 2, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rex Hatfield, Everly Hatfield, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rex Hatfield and Everly Hatfield appeal the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying relief on their complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Hatfield v. Garrison, No. 5:11-cv-00498
(S.D. W. Va. May 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.