The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6906•Tyrone Dale v. Officer Baker; Officer Fontaine; Officer Mosher; Officer Oliver
12-6906Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 26, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6906
TYRONE DALE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
OFFICER BAKER; OFFICER FONTAINE; OFFICER MOSHER; OFFICER
OLIVER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen Lipton Hollander, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-01552-ELH)
Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Dale, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Breads, Jr., Matthew
Douglas Peter, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Dale appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dale v.
Baker, No. 1:11-cv-01552-ELH (D. Md. Filed Mar. 13, 2012 &
entered Mar. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.