The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6900•United States of America v. Charles Edward Callis, a/k/a BJ
12-6900Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6900
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHARLES EDWARD CALLIS, a/k/a BJ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:00-cr-00016-RAJ-1)
Submitted: August 22, 2012 Decided: August 27, 2012
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Edward Callis, Appellant Pro Se. Scott W. Putney,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
George Edward Callis appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for
reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Callis, No. 4:00-cr-
00016-RAJ-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.