United States of America v. Donnell Andrew Scott, a/k/a Dee-Nice

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6893
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DONNELL ANDREW SCOTT, a/k/a Dee-Nice,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:09-cr-00186-JRS-1)
Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 26, 2012
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donnell Andrew Scott, Appellant Pro Se. David Vincent Harbach,
II, Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Donnell Andrew Scott appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a
reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Scott, No.
3:09-cr-00186-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 18, 2012); see also United
States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, 201 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting
that § 3582 proceeding is “not considered a full resentencing by
the court”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --