Edward Harold Saunders, Jr. v. Kenneth E. Lay

12-6883Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 12, 2012

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6883
EDWARD HAROLD SAUNDERS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KENNETH E. LAY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00566-BO)
Submitted: September 4, 2012 Decided: September 12, 2012
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Harold Saunders, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Harold Saunders, Jr. appeals the district
court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. See Saunders v. Lay, No. 5:11-cv-00566-BO (E.D.N.C.
Apr. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.