The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6837•United States of America v. John Eric Hughes
12-6837Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 19, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6837
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOHN ERIC HUGHES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2)
Submitted: September 20, 2012 Decided: October 19, 2012
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Eric Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II,
David Thomas Maguire, Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Eric Hughes appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Hughes, No. 3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2012). We
deny Hughes’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.