The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6836•United States of America v. Bruce Lamont Goodwin
12-6836Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 2, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6836
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRUCE LAMONT GOODWIN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief
District Judge. (5:10-cr-00835-MBS-6)
Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 2, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce Lamont Goodwin, Appellant Pro Se. Winston David Holliday,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bruce Lamont Goodwin appeals the district court’s text
order denying his post-judgment motion to reduce his sentence.
We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United
States v. Goodwin, No. 5:10-cr-00835-MBS-6 (D.S.C. Apr. 23,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.