The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6824•Benjamin Ashley Gardner v. Ellen Barry Grunden
12-6824Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 11, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6824
BENJAMIN ASHLEY GARDNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ELLEN BARRY GRUNDEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-00935-JKB)
Submitted: August 29, 2012 Decided: September 11, 2012
Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin Ashley Gardner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin Ashley Gardner appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Gardner v. Grunden,
No. 1:12-cv-00935-JKB (D. Md. filed Apr. 3, 2012; entered
Apr. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.