The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6819•United States of America v. Mujaddid Rahim Muhammad, a/k/a Stacey Lamar Marsh
12-6819Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 26, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6819
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MUJADDID RAHIM MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Stacey Lamar Marsh,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (3:91-cr-00114-2)
Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 26, 2012
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mujaddid Rahim Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail,
Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mujaddid Rahim Muhammad appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 to correct a
clerical error in the judgment of conviction. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Muhammad, No. 3:91-cr-00114-2 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 18, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.