The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6808•United States of America v. Kenneth Bronson Hughes, a/k/a Andrew Alfonso Skeeter
12-6808Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 1, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6808
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KENNETH BRONSON HUGHES, a/k/a Andrew Alfonso Skeeter,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior
District Judge. (6:02-cr-70105-NKM-2)
Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Bronson Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew
Bassford, Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Bronson Hughes appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence,
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Hughes, No. 6:02-cr-70105-NKM-2 (W.D. Va. Mar. 30,
2012; Apr. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.