The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6802•Kendall Green v. Sgt. D. Anderson, of Lee Correctional Institution
12-6802Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 1, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6802
KENDALL GREEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SGT. D. ANDERSON, of Lee Correctional Institution; JON
OZMINT, Director of SCDC; LT. RICHARDSON, SMU Security; MS.
L. JOHNSON, Grievance Coordinator; MAJOR JAMES C. DEAN,
Security Over Institution; WARDEN PADULA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (2:10-cv-03080-CMC)
Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kendall Green, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II,
WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kendall Green appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Green v. Anderson, No. 2:10-cv-03080-CMC (D.S.C. Apr.
11, 2012). We deny Green’s motion for a transcript at
government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.