United States of America v. Albert Randolph, a/k/a Spo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6800
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ALBERT RANDOLPH, a/k/a Spo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:01-cr-00304-JRS-11)
Submitted: August 28, 2012 Decided: September 11, 2012
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey,
Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Albert Randolph appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Randolph, No.
3:01-cr-00304-JRS-11 (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --