The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6782•William Marrow-El v. BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner
12-6782Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 7, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6782
WILLIAM MARROW-EL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:11-cv-01009-JFM)
Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Marrow-El, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-
Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Marrow-El appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and
denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Marrow-El’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Marrow-El v. Shearin, No.
1:11-cv-01009-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 2, 2012 & Mar. 27, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.