United States of America v. Janice Marie Carter

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6770
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JANICE MARIE CARTER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (7:09-cr-00027-JCT-1)
Submitted: September 6, 2012 Decided: September 11, 2012
Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janice Marie Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Janice Marie Carter appeals the district court’s order
denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence
reduction based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines,
as well as its order denying her motion for reconsideration.
Our review of the record demonstrates that Amendment 750 did not
alter Carter’s Guidelines range. See United States v. Munn, 595
F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010). We also conclude that the
district court correctly determined that it lacked authority to
entertain Carter’s motion for reconsideration. See United
States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --