The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6753•United States of America v. Bobby Samuel Hughes, Jr.
12-6753Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 2, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6753
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BOBBY SAMUEL HUGHES, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:00-cr-00004-JRS-1)
Submitted: September 20, 2012 Decided: November 2, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobby Samuel Hughes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate
Grant, II, David Thomas Maguire, Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United
States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bobby Samuel Hughes, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Hughes,
No. 3:00-cr-00004-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 6, 2012). We deny
Hughes’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.