The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6743•United States of America v. Larry Roscoe Gunnell, Jr.
12-6743Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 6, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6743
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LARRY ROSCOE GUNNELL, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:99-cr-00022-JRS-1)
Submitted: September 25, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Roscoe Gunnell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Norval George
Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Roscoe Gunnell, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his motions for correction of clerical
error under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 and for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Gunnell, No. 3:99-cr-00022-JRS-1 (E.D.
Va. Dec. 16, 2011 & Mar. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.