The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-6730•Joshua Latron Gallishaw v. Officer Deloach
12-6730Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 20, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6730
JOSHUA LATRON GALLISHAW,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
OFFICER DELOACH; OFFICER WILLIAMSON; SGT HICKS; CAPT BEST;
WARDEN COHEN; MAJOR NLN; SGT MARQUEZ; SGT HOUSEY; LT
HOUSEY; SCDC DIRECTOR, and other unknown John Does, Janes
Does, individual and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (9:11-cv-00404-CMC)
Submitted: June 14, 2012 Decided: June 20, 2012
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joshua Latron Gallishaw, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur,
III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joshua Latron Gallishaw appeals the district court’s
orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and
denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Gallishaw v. Deloach, No.
9:11-cv-00404-CMC (D.S.C. Feb. 16 & Apr. 2, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.